Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-14 23:55:02 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 90F4AB74F83159B49B134DC5EE258B0E6137F9DF3F3F750B8F35C16595300D6B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The article doesn't accuse the organizations of having prior knowledge, so denials of prior knowledge are off topic and links to such denials misleading. Potential bias of HonestReporting belongs in the replies, but when used to say ignore the photos it's a genetic fallacy.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1722738358374318228
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 90F4AB74F83159B49B134DC5EE258B0E6137F9DF3F3F750B8F35C16595300D6B
  • createdAtMillis - 1710460502254
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 172273835837431822890F4AB74F83159B49B134DC5EE258B0E6137F9DF3F3F750B8F35C16595300D6B