Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-10 11:28:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 38DA7110CB92EC2EC1A7AF9B3C159F8B5CF1E8DBCCC2C3D7CB0EE5C8A0225E30
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The article doesn't accuse the organizations of having prior knowledge, so denials of prior knowledge are off topic and links to such denials misleading. Potential bias of HonestReporting belongs in the replies, but when used to say ignore the photos it's a genetic fallacy.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1722738358374318228
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 38DA7110CB92EC2EC1A7AF9B3C159F8B5CF1E8DBCCC2C3D7CB0EE5C8A0225E30
  • createdAtMillis - 1699615729108
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 172273835837431822838DA7110CB92EC2EC1A7AF9B3C159F8B5CF1E8DBCCC2C3D7CB0EE5C8A0225E30