Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-10 06:33:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E56E665B9C083775086D7848B6DFD1753DC7AE35C46E4FE1F77BCECEC99F2581
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN- As the other note said this is OBVIOUSLY dangereous and doesn’t need to be proven in a note

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1722441946415641008
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E56E665B9C083775086D7848B6DFD1753DC7AE35C46E4FE1F77BCECEC99F2581
  • createdAtMillis - 1699597996826
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1722441946415641008E56E665B9C083775086D7848B6DFD1753DC7AE35C46E4FE1F77BCECEC99F2581