Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-09 02:53:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C651AF1C2F664139E41BDCEA554099D0E90B5117D8F84C47CE923F0F58A180C4
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article asks serious questions about certain freelance journalists but does not accuse them of any terrorist act. The article does not implicate media companies in the attack either but does question their publication of these freelancers. https://t.co/HXVLHj0m6X

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1722392002321404206
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C651AF1C2F664139E41BDCEA554099D0E90B5117D8F84C47CE923F0F58A180C4
  • createdAtMillis - 1699498398035
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1722392002321404206C651AF1C2F664139E41BDCEA554099D0E90B5117D8F84C47CE923F0F58A180C4