Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-09 04:28:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6AB3511508B2B5C51EE0F23BAE63DA03C491E3B81F596C1E4A35045DEFAB9C1E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article asks serious questions about certain freelance journalists but does not accuse them of any terrorist act. The article does not implicate media companies in the attack either but does question their publication of these freelancers. https://t.co/HXVLHj0m6X

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1722392002321404206
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6AB3511508B2B5C51EE0F23BAE63DA03C491E3B81F596C1E4A35045DEFAB9C1E
  • createdAtMillis - 1699504086926
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17223920023214042066AB3511508B2B5C51EE0F23BAE63DA03C491E3B81F596C1E4A35045DEFAB9C1E