Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-08 20:41:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EF0EBB7AEDC34AEB4E49B03061FE3E133B019DAC58F907D41A48B514390917F1
Participant Details

Original Note:

None of the claims that the respective freelance photographers were “embedded”, “knew” or “participated” is supported or evidenced in the linked article. https://t.co/HXVLHj0m6X

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1722331084682146213
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EF0EBB7AEDC34AEB4E49B03061FE3E133B019DAC58F907D41A48B514390917F1
  • createdAtMillis - 1699476065116
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1722331084682146213EF0EBB7AEDC34AEB4E49B03061FE3E133B019DAC58F907D41A48B514390917F1