Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-09 12:39:39 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 366CDCF79FAD7B31214941D10C10ACABFB32DD75E848930A7C7210C5F2C117F4
Participant Details

Original Note:

The court already ruled twice that the disclaimer clause does not shield Trump from liability. Not only is it already in evidence, but, since it does not shield Trump, now irrelevant to the issue of damages. Read the summary judgement opinion here: https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-letitia-james-fraud-lawsuit-1569245a9284427117b8d3ba5da74249

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1722284269803106359
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 366CDCF79FAD7B31214941D10C10ACABFB32DD75E848930A7C7210C5F2C117F4
createdAtMillis - 1699533579924
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1722284269803106359366CDCF79FAD7B31214941D10C10ACABFB32DD75E848930A7C7210C5F2C117F4