Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-08 21:56:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D1F6E83B7E51C1CFE95778785D08A10E68715CDB6F1E17EF730F276A0794AD39
Participant Details

Original Note:

Es gibt scientific Evidence dafür, dass der Twitter Algorithmus right wing Content amplified. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2025334119

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1722251606325137842
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D1F6E83B7E51C1CFE95778785D08A10E68715CDB6F1E17EF730F276A0794AD39
  • createdAtMillis - 1699480616878
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1722251606325137842D1F6E83B7E51C1CFE95778785D08A10E68715CDB6F1E17EF730F276A0794AD39