Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-08 13:59:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B8EA43413F6B3B47B2475BD87F0CDFCA18B67C06612757447785A2EE5730E0BE
Participant Details

Original Note:

Es gibt scientific Evidence dafür, dass der Twitter Algorithmus right wing Content amplified. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2025334119

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1722251606325137842
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B8EA43413F6B3B47B2475BD87F0CDFCA18B67C06612757447785A2EE5730E0BE
  • createdAtMillis - 1699451998524
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1722251606325137842B8EA43413F6B3B47B2475BD87F0CDFCA18B67C06612757447785A2EE5730E0BE