Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-08 16:42:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 21C334123E6179AE950A1E0E0CCF4CAF82964461553F3C93F06D683ADD926350
Participant Details

Original Note:

Die Anzahl der Follower eines Accounts lässt keine pauschalen Aussagen über das zu erwartende Engagement (in diesem Fall Likes) mit einzelnen Posts zu. X erläutert seinen Empfehlungs-Algorithmus hier: https://blog.twitter.com/engineering/en_us/topics/open-source/2023/twitter-recommendation-algorithm Weiteren Einfluss haben Qualität, Zeitpunkt und Inhalt des Posts.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1722154075494449605
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 21C334123E6179AE950A1E0E0CCF4CAF82964461553F3C93F06D683ADD926350
  • createdAtMillis - 1699461736197
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 172215407549444960521C334123E6179AE950A1E0E0CCF4CAF82964461553F3C93F06D683ADD926350