Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-08 03:49:49 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CEF613C2B82374A710171136D5E1CEC2DF1823EFE413DB99ED7C89012FD6DF2F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The claim that Stanford is a government agent has been refuted in this detailed legal filing: https://fsi9-prod.s3.us-west-1.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/2023-07/5th_cir._23-30445_dckt_000074_001_filed_2023-07-28.pdf The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals accepted this arguments and has twice recognized Stanford's 1st Amendment rights in this matter (page 69): https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/23/23-30445-CV1.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1721983162140782763
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CEF613C2B82374A710171136D5E1CEC2DF1823EFE413DB99ED7C89012FD6DF2F
  • createdAtMillis - 1699415389174
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1721983162140782763CEF613C2B82374A710171136D5E1CEC2DF1823EFE413DB99ED7C89012FD6DF2F