Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-07 11:38:22 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A7CD8CA4B232D5D4DABEA262334EF19BC1E6C4322E87ED3BF2C41F55745A59BB
Participant Details

Original Note:

El artículo está escrito por “Editorial Board”, o el Consejo de redacción del Financial Times, no ninguna colaboradora externa https://www.ft.com/content/4e8a587b-5ffd-4328-9cdb-7ed84fb61b86

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1721830025358413848
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A7CD8CA4B232D5D4DABEA262334EF19BC1E6C4322E87ED3BF2C41F55745A59BB
  • createdAtMillis - 1699357102192
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1721830025358413848A7CD8CA4B232D5D4DABEA262334EF19BC1E6C4322E87ED3BF2C41F55745A59BB