Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-07 09:48:01 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FF1D0CC50CFB454EA98EF12505316EB3F387EF8D8C0EC53D51B17513D0EDE346
Participant Details

Original Note:

Sarah Ashton-Cirillo wies diese Behauptung zurück: https://x.com/sarahashtonlv/status/1721602373452214722 Das Bild, das sie angeblich in einem Hijab zeigt, wurde digital so verändert, dass es aussah, als stamme es aus dem Threads-Konto. Es gibt keinen solchen Beitrag. https://www.threads.net/@sarahashtonlv

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1721679535286956199
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FF1D0CC50CFB454EA98EF12505316EB3F387EF8D8C0EC53D51B17513D0EDE346
  • createdAtMillis - 1699350481546
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1721679535286956199FF1D0CC50CFB454EA98EF12505316EB3F387EF8D8C0EC53D51B17513D0EDE346