Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-08 18:15:02 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5AF1035E9E3E5A076D1F680B88FC9526BB37E172D4AE614825E99C1251A3128D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Sarah Ashton-Cirillo wies diese Behauptung zurück: https://x.com/sarahashtonlv/status/1721602373452214722 Das Bild, das sie angeblich in einem Hijab zeigt, wurde digital so verändert, dass es aussah, als stamme es aus dem Threads-Konto. Es gibt keinen solchen Beitrag. https://www.threads.net/@sarahashtonlv

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1721679535286956199
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5AF1035E9E3E5A076D1F680B88FC9526BB37E172D4AE614825E99C1251A3128D
  • createdAtMillis - 1699467302497
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17216795352869561995AF1035E9E3E5A076D1F680B88FC9526BB37E172D4AE614825E99C1251A3128D