Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-07 11:52:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F07A3A3E0B276C44BA8E976CDDF084A2B91FE9156395EAC466770DE971E6186C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN It might or might not be a « thirst trap ». If there is no proof, the CN is speculation which is an option for no note needed. CN should not add context if it is not certain.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1721619585994989688
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F07A3A3E0B276C44BA8E976CDDF084A2B91FE9156395EAC466770DE971E6186C
  • createdAtMillis - 1699357931983
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1721619585994989688F07A3A3E0B276C44BA8E976CDDF084A2B91FE9156395EAC466770DE971E6186C