Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-10 22:11:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CE0AEEF6654DB846F92E2D5A8DA06F713791EC8AE7DADE256F2698ADE575AFB4
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN It might or might not be a « thirst trap ». If there is no proof, the CN is speculation which is an option for no note needed. CN should not add context if it is not certain.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1721619585994989688
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CE0AEEF6654DB846F92E2D5A8DA06F713791EC8AE7DADE256F2698ADE575AFB4
  • createdAtMillis - 1710108677124
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1721619585994989688CE0AEEF6654DB846F92E2D5A8DA06F713791EC8AE7DADE256F2698ADE575AFB4