Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-08 13:15:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6BC8EAABA1765B6A39DF0E70CF7E2FF1710EE352BDB23B96E1A66D9293BD36B5
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN It might or might not be a « thirst trap ». If there is no proof, the CN is speculation which is an option for no note needed. CN should not add context if it is not certain.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1721619585994989688
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6BC8EAABA1765B6A39DF0E70CF7E2FF1710EE352BDB23B96E1A66D9293BD36B5
  • createdAtMillis - 1699449333858
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17216195859949896886BC8EAABA1765B6A39DF0E70CF7E2FF1710EE352BDB23B96E1A66D9293BD36B5