Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-07 00:55:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4E42137B67E7F2D4E600E654E6634EAD6E27BF4F0E4452A0CD4B073FA8A28E84
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN It might or might not be a « thirst trap ». If there is no proof, the CN is speculation which is an option for no note needed. CN should not add context if it is not certain.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1721619585994989688
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4E42137B67E7F2D4E600E654E6634EAD6E27BF4F0E4452A0CD4B073FA8A28E84
  • createdAtMillis - 1699318500440
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17216195859949896884E42137B67E7F2D4E600E654E6634EAD6E27BF4F0E4452A0CD4B073FA8A28E84