Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-06 07:07:22 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5388286E19470E942A8CBF48A122446DA8856B7A88259D7C24E4A79EC23F3564
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Claim in the image is that she wasn't put in his Will after marriage, This is True she and his disowned son were not in his Will. And for the record she never got 400m either, the Supreme court ruled she has a right to pursue the estate not that she was entitled to anything.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1721383684425822347
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5388286E19470E942A8CBF48A122446DA8856B7A88259D7C24E4A79EC23F3564
  • createdAtMillis - 1699254442500
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17213836844258223475388286E19470E942A8CBF48A122446DA8856B7A88259D7C24E4A79EC23F3564