Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-06 07:20:52 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 450280783AC0486381D986763407E023D380326136A0FD434BEC2840053C271A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Claim in the image is that she wasn't put in his Will after marriage, This is True she and his disowned son were not in his Will. And for the record she never got 400m either, the Supreme court ruled she has a right to pursue the estate not that she was entitled to anything.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1721383684425822347
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 450280783AC0486381D986763407E023D380326136A0FD434BEC2840053C271A
  • createdAtMillis - 1699255252920
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1721383684425822347450280783AC0486381D986763407E023D380326136A0FD434BEC2840053C271A