Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-06 00:52:44 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 859B8699A2AC7C4E6DD87103E31BE792BAC169C43D4DE7C1D643734FF08A26DF
Participant Details

Original Note:

First, this is clearly satire. Second the claim is factually correct. She was not included in his will. And finally, the article cited in the suggested notes points out that the decision to grant $400M was appealed and overturned overturned.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1721282090971410710
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 859B8699A2AC7C4E6DD87103E31BE792BAC169C43D4DE7C1D643734FF08A26DF
  • createdAtMillis - 1699231964742
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1721282090971410710859B8699A2AC7C4E6DD87103E31BE792BAC169C43D4DE7C1D643734FF08A26DF