Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-06 07:21:09 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 450280783AC0486381D986763407E023D380326136A0FD434BEC2840053C271A
Participant Details

Original Note:

First, this is clearly satire. Second the claim is factually correct. She was not included in his will. And finally, the article cited in the suggested notes points out that the decision to grant $400M was appealed and overturned overturned.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1721282090971410710
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 450280783AC0486381D986763407E023D380326136A0FD434BEC2840053C271A
  • createdAtMillis - 1699255269328
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1721282090971410710450280783AC0486381D986763407E023D380326136A0FD434BEC2840053C271A