Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-05 22:28:18 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 395ABA0CF4E874647315B391111F079B9415E8F70D49EAEB8CFA7470C524BEF9
Participant Details

Original Note:

First, this is clearly satire. Second the claim is factually correct. She was not included in his will. And finally, the article cited in the suggested notes points out that the decision to grant $400M was appealed and overturned overturned.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1721282090971410710
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 395ABA0CF4E874647315B391111F079B9415E8F70D49EAEB8CFA7470C524BEF9
  • createdAtMillis - 1699223298870
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1721282090971410710395ABA0CF4E874647315B391111F079B9415E8F70D49EAEB8CFA7470C524BEF9