Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-06 01:02:12 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 016CA2E4EAC219C921F478B24FF6E7BAAABE7AE219B10437E6300FBAAFE2032D
Participant Details

Original Note:

First, this is clearly satire. Second the claim is factually correct. She was not included in his will. And finally, the article cited in the suggested notes points out that the decision to grant $400M was appealed and overturned overturned.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1721282090971410710
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 016CA2E4EAC219C921F478B24FF6E7BAAABE7AE219B10437E6300FBAAFE2032D
  • createdAtMillis - 1699232532863
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1721282090971410710016CA2E4EAC219C921F478B24FF6E7BAAABE7AE219B10437E6300FBAAFE2032D