Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-05 12:58:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 81C5CA4F401093D2F9D0C719B00A061984D19C4499F81AF7ECD9419BF512D791
Participant Details

Original Note:

理解増進法の成立が抑止に働いた判例があります。 https://mainichi.jp/articles/20231102/k00/00m/040/328000c https://www.call4.jp/file/pdf/202311/a63b1be1056bff33405d6d86fa7e3f40.pdf (P.9)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1721122688922775661
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 81C5CA4F401093D2F9D0C719B00A061984D19C4499F81AF7ECD9419BF512D791
  • createdAtMillis - 1699189100536
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 172112268892277566181C5CA4F401093D2F9D0C719B00A061984D19C4499F81AF7ECD9419BF512D791