Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-05 12:11:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7EB7E6798560207798E32F83B8DD392D17F262217E8BE72FA39A583BF15F836E
Participant Details

Original Note:

理解増進法の成立が抑止に働いた判例があります。 https://mainichi.jp/articles/20231102/k00/00m/040/328000c https://www.call4.jp/file/pdf/202311/a63b1be1056bff33405d6d86fa7e3f40.pdf (P.9)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1721122688922775661
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7EB7E6798560207798E32F83B8DD392D17F262217E8BE72FA39A583BF15F836E
  • createdAtMillis - 1699186317749
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17211226889227756617EB7E6798560207798E32F83B8DD392D17F262217E8BE72FA39A583BF15F836E