Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-03-06 22:11:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: F6925EDEFB659A6CA76BA1582FA3F5414784FDCC324253010431B465A64EE90D
Participant Details
Original Note:
Wrong. What is relevant for the prohibition of the use of force between states and the associated right of self-defense is not the status of a territory under international law, but the existence of a reasonably stable dividing line. De facto rule (Hamas) is sufficient. https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/public/Research/International%20Law/ilpforce.doc
All Note Details