Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-03-20 00:19:16 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: E653841B69AB991EE64F43FF1E833AE834E8F2A576EC52BC09A4787990F1247F
Participant Details
Original Note:
Wrong. What is relevant for the prohibition of the use of force between states and the associated right of self-defense is not the status of a territory under international law, but the existence of a reasonably stable dividing line. De facto rule (Hamas) is sufficient. https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/public/Research/International%20Law/ilpforce.doc
All Note Details