Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-03-15 12:02:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: B46E692A08BBA14CA4F214DC485BC2A96127D4E75F4550E601D6C00BD8DE95BD
Participant Details
Original Note:
Wrong. What is relevant for the prohibition of the use of force between states and the associated right of self-defense is not the status of a territory under international law, but the existence of a reasonably stable dividing line. De facto rule (Hamas) is sufficient. https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/public/Research/International%20Law/ilpforce.doc
All Note Details