Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-05 19:58:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D2ADF4168C9B3F7A96FC09406E55E641775D68D4A160ECC4EBDFFFAC461E6B42
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN The claims made by both parties in this exchange have not been conclusively settled, eg: https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/18973/pdf/ The other proposed notes cite other evidence. The proposed notes are litigating the point, which should be done in the comments, not Community Notes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1720903308464767319
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D2ADF4168C9B3F7A96FC09406E55E641775D68D4A160ECC4EBDFFFAC461E6B42
  • createdAtMillis - 1699214288794
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1720903308464767319D2ADF4168C9B3F7A96FC09406E55E641775D68D4A160ECC4EBDFFFAC461E6B42