Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-04 21:26:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C5BBECFED535E99A6C67153E169A33153715639324E4C099D6362DB241AE8A0F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN The claims made by both parties in this exchange have not been conclusively settled, eg: https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/18973/pdf/ The other proposed notes cite other evidence. The proposed notes are litigating the point, which should be done in the comments, not Community Notes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1720903308464767319
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C5BBECFED535E99A6C67153E169A33153715639324E4C099D6362DB241AE8A0F
  • createdAtMillis - 1699133202228
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1720903308464767319C5BBECFED535E99A6C67153E169A33153715639324E4C099D6362DB241AE8A0F