Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-09 11:48:09 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C4A09401A4695ACED5A6D8CA80588A6BF13FC9BB8EEBC0B1125DCF7A138151A5
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN The claims made by both parties in this exchange have not been conclusively settled, eg: https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/18973/pdf/ The other proposed notes cite other evidence. The proposed notes are litigating the point, which should be done in the comments, not Community Notes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1720903308464767319
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C4A09401A4695ACED5A6D8CA80588A6BF13FC9BB8EEBC0B1125DCF7A138151A5
  • createdAtMillis - 1707479289567
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1720903308464767319C4A09401A4695ACED5A6D8CA80588A6BF13FC9BB8EEBC0B1125DCF7A138151A5