Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-05 05:58:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9E59A5217AA1C119AEB91E9F7FFD14995F1DC2E87FC2DDD68566F4BC5E116318
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN The claims made by both parties in this exchange have not been conclusively settled, eg: https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/18973/pdf/ The other proposed notes cite other evidence. The proposed notes are litigating the point, which should be done in the comments, not Community Notes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1720903308464767319
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9E59A5217AA1C119AEB91E9F7FFD14995F1DC2E87FC2DDD68566F4BC5E116318
  • createdAtMillis - 1699163926043
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17209033084647673199E59A5217AA1C119AEB91E9F7FFD14995F1DC2E87FC2DDD68566F4BC5E116318