Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-05 08:17:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7CE7A11FEE0C87F242259D0F553A87AB1F562322EAD8364D4191E55BF2F23F06
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN The claims made by both parties in this exchange have not been conclusively settled, eg: https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/18973/pdf/ The other proposed notes cite other evidence. The proposed notes are litigating the point, which should be done in the comments, not Community Notes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1720903308464767319
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7CE7A11FEE0C87F242259D0F553A87AB1F562322EAD8364D4191E55BF2F23F06
  • createdAtMillis - 1699172272306
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17209033084647673197CE7A11FEE0C87F242259D0F553A87AB1F562322EAD8364D4191E55BF2F23F06