Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-05 05:48:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2A301C42EF321D3B6F61C3B81D91C582171581EA92779237AC5421866ADA4A95
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed rules states that “a practitioner may, where appropriate, provide the court with the correct … preferred gender pronouns”. Whether this rule would apply in the hypothetical lawsuit Rowling mentions is not obvious. https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/legal-affairs/south-australia-court-calls-for-use-of-preferred-gender-pronouns/news-story/08cde896d4fbd8fd511a37ea9ae9b99a

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1720901132174676344
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2A301C42EF321D3B6F61C3B81D91C582171581EA92779237AC5421866ADA4A95
  • createdAtMillis - 1699163328396
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17209011321746763442A301C42EF321D3B6F61C3B81D91C582171581EA92779237AC5421866ADA4A95