Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-04 06:08:08 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E612553FBF62C06DB2E292ABAEDC784A0F9B3708862E62F8BCFA5ABEB7CE0029
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN: The post is regarding a question asked in court that’s hypothetical. And the assertion is that there’s evidence being withheld by the state that hasn’t yet been seen in a court. That’s the opinion of the poster. Thus, the original CN isn’t justified or necessary.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1720585646710931705
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E612553FBF62C06DB2E292ABAEDC784A0F9B3708862E62F8BCFA5ABEB7CE0029
  • createdAtMillis - 1699078088058
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1720585646710931705E612553FBF62C06DB2E292ABAEDC784A0F9B3708862E62F8BCFA5ABEB7CE0029