Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-04 00:28:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5A7523758B29E89237729415D05B330563018F6D30FED339C94CBDBFBE1CE515
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN: The post is regarding a question asked in court that’s hypothetical. And the assertion is that there’s evidence being withheld by the state that hasn’t yet been seen in a court. That’s the opinion of the poster. Thus, the original CN isn’t justified or necessary.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1720585646710931705
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5A7523758B29E89237729415D05B330563018F6D30FED339C94CBDBFBE1CE515
  • createdAtMillis - 1699057698545
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17205856467109317055A7523758B29E89237729415D05B330563018F6D30FED339C94CBDBFBE1CE515