Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-04 16:42:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0CE1E83C8E717DE46FC44C334C4CB6A559D62A1749ADB9E1620701FCD400FC4B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN: The post is regarding a question asked in court that’s hypothetical. And the assertion is that there’s evidence being withheld by the state that hasn’t yet been seen in a court. That’s the opinion of the poster. Thus, the original CN isn’t justified or necessary.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1720585646710931705
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0CE1E83C8E717DE46FC44C334C4CB6A559D62A1749ADB9E1620701FCD400FC4B
  • createdAtMillis - 1699116177728
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17205856467109317050CE1E83C8E717DE46FC44C334C4CB6A559D62A1749ADB9E1620701FCD400FC4B