Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-01 02:58:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3174B58DF6A29D3BADE5F8D69EEB7995B49E32B504CA663718430B1D93548D63
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. This is not an agency and is careful not to call itself that. It is a photography studio marketing model portfolios. Opinions about the ethics should be in the comments of the post not here.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1720542874587029745
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3174B58DF6A29D3BADE5F8D69EEB7995B49E32B504CA663718430B1D93548D63
  • createdAtMillis - 1704077935082
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17205428745870297453174B58DF6A29D3BADE5F8D69EEB7995B49E32B504CA663718430B1D93548D63