Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-04 17:52:24 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E03A3845F7859D9B56E7EA3D7EB842E8BCD4C0FEB29C9811A471ABA16C6B11B1
Participant Details

Original Note:

CWH: merci d’exprimer votre opinion personnelle en dehors des notes, les journalistes de l’AFP ont informé (leur travail) sur ce qu’a subi leur propre bureau ils sont mieux au courant que vous utiliser la section commentaire pour votre opinion svp https://t.co/kWeWzYUhL5

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1720447235484238314
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E03A3845F7859D9B56E7EA3D7EB842E8BCD4C0FEB29C9811A471ABA16C6B11B1
  • createdAtMillis - 1699120344046
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1720447235484238314E03A3845F7859D9B56E7EA3D7EB842E8BCD4C0FEB29C9811A471ABA16C6B11B1