Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-03 20:02:38 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B6E3FD989DAF3BC7ADAE9122FDEC8A5B7A1646869B54286A948C0CF4BDEDF0BE
Participant Details

Original Note:

CWH: merci d’exprimer votre opinion personnelle en dehors des notes, les journalistes de l’AFP ont informé (leur travail) sur ce qu’a subi leur propre bureau ils sont mieux au courant que vous utiliser la section commentaire pour votre opinion svp https://t.co/kWeWzYUhL5

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1720447235484238314
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B6E3FD989DAF3BC7ADAE9122FDEC8A5B7A1646869B54286A948C0CF4BDEDF0BE
  • createdAtMillis - 1699041758259
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1720447235484238314B6E3FD989DAF3BC7ADAE9122FDEC8A5B7A1646869B54286A948C0CF4BDEDF0BE