Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-03 15:56:24 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 88D02F4B6F311FCD74CBD78D0C35514C434BBC2866A34DEB3FEFA799B4A7C81A
Participant Details

Original Note:

CWH: merci d’exprimer votre opinion personnelle en dehors des notes, les journalistes de l’AFP ont informé (leur travail) sur ce qu’a subi leur propre bureau ils sont mieux au courant que vous utiliser la section commentaire pour votre opinion svp https://t.co/kWeWzYUhL5

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1720447235484238314
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 88D02F4B6F311FCD74CBD78D0C35514C434BBC2866A34DEB3FEFA799B4A7C81A
  • createdAtMillis - 1699026984395
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 172044723548423831488D02F4B6F311FCD74CBD78D0C35514C434BBC2866A34DEB3FEFA799B4A7C81A