Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-03 15:42:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 33EE46338DC95256B5DFB6E853719284A19E9DBD6FFB3D14AC0AC02250FEE2BA
Participant Details

Original Note:

CWH: merci d’exprimer votre opinion personnelle en dehors des notes, les journalistes de l’AFP ont informé (leur travail) sur ce qu’a subi leur propre bureau ils sont mieux au courant que vous utiliser la section commentaire pour votre opinion svp https://t.co/kWeWzYUhL5

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1720447235484238314
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 33EE46338DC95256B5DFB6E853719284A19E9DBD6FFB3D14AC0AC02250FEE2BA
  • createdAtMillis - 1699026177307
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 172044723548423831433EE46338DC95256B5DFB6E853719284A19E9DBD6FFB3D14AC0AC02250FEE2BA