Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-04 19:08:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 286F677F51A9AE9BF92DFF38037D353143D78C13FDE40765A5045227D10DE95D
Participant Details

Original Note:

CWH: merci d’exprimer votre opinion personnelle en dehors des notes, les journalistes de l’AFP ont informé (leur travail) sur ce qu’a subi leur propre bureau ils sont mieux au courant que vous utiliser la section commentaire pour votre opinion svp https://t.co/kWeWzYUhL5

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1720447235484238314
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 286F677F51A9AE9BF92DFF38037D353143D78C13FDE40765A5045227D10DE95D
  • createdAtMillis - 1699124884940
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1720447235484238314286F677F51A9AE9BF92DFF38037D353143D78C13FDE40765A5045227D10DE95D