Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-03 04:13:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EB032421B35A2105A248759D3BB3EFF73304F490906E8754C2810FA3CC6BED8D
Participant Details

Original Note:

No hay evidencia de que hubo fraude electoral, los telegramas del escrutinio provisional no son documentos con validez legal, y errores en estos son totalmente normales en las elecciones: https://chequeado.com/el-explicador/por-que-las-inconsistencias-en-los-telegramas-del-escrutinio-provisorio-no-implican-fraude-electoral/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1720277911062581338
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EB032421B35A2105A248759D3BB3EFF73304F490906E8754C2810FA3CC6BED8D
  • createdAtMillis - 1698984798702
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1720277911062581338EB032421B35A2105A248759D3BB3EFF73304F490906E8754C2810FA3CC6BED8D