Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-04 00:26:19 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 61853475F7824A3EB4978E30289F16363FDF0508B780C48B14F94F41B4249D6E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note claims IVM has no anticancer properties, but the linked page in the tweet thread provides 3 articles asserting the opposite. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31215501/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7505114/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7505114/ Proposed note is arguably opinion or speculation, possibly outright incorrect information.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1720219811005993413
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 61853475F7824A3EB4978E30289F16363FDF0508B780C48B14F94F41B4249D6E
  • createdAtMillis - 1699057579309
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 172021981100599341361853475F7824A3EB4978E30289F16363FDF0508B780C48B14F94F41B4249D6E