Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-03 03:22:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 735BF5E9E65F0E2A852D9373A369376665DDD7719F29020544C5472774330B54
Participant Details

Original Note:

The impropriety here was not fraudulent ballots submitted as OP suggests. None of the absentee ballots submitted are alleged to be fraudulent. The judge took issue with representatives of the party submitting multiple absentee ballots & how they were being shoved and handled. https://apnews.com/article/connecticut-judge-bridgeport-ganim-mayor-election-1e6d23567703c55430968ffdaa0b6369

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1720134228472463488
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 735BF5E9E65F0E2A852D9373A369376665DDD7719F29020544C5472774330B54
  • createdAtMillis - 1698981745810
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1720134228472463488735BF5E9E65F0E2A852D9373A369376665DDD7719F29020544C5472774330B54