Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-02 20:42:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 48057404BC538DBD056EFE4D53DC43E27F5149B26F23E31C222116642784CEE5
Participant Details

Original Note:

The impropriety here was not fraudulent ballots submitted as OP suggests. None of the absentee ballots submitted are alleged to be fraudulent. The judge took issue with representatives of the party submitting multiple absentee ballots & how they were being shoved and handled. https://apnews.com/article/connecticut-judge-bridgeport-ganim-mayor-election-1e6d23567703c55430968ffdaa0b6369

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1720134228472463488
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 48057404BC538DBD056EFE4D53DC43E27F5149B26F23E31C222116642784CEE5
  • createdAtMillis - 1698957753610
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 172013422847246348848057404BC538DBD056EFE4D53DC43E27F5149B26F23E31C222116642784CEE5