Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-02 18:05:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3995152358C6DB55697617A5C92B17641358A774653D388FC1254C97E6431343
Participant Details

Original Note:

The impropriety here was not fraudulent ballots submitted as OP suggests. None of the absentee ballots submitted are alleged to be fraudulent. The judge took issue with representatives of the party submitting multiple absentee ballots & how they were being shoved and handled. https://apnews.com/article/connecticut-judge-bridgeport-ganim-mayor-election-1e6d23567703c55430968ffdaa0b6369

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1720134228472463488
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3995152358C6DB55697617A5C92B17641358A774653D388FC1254C97E6431343
  • createdAtMillis - 1698948328969
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17201342284724634883995152358C6DB55697617A5C92B17641358A774653D388FC1254C97E6431343