Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-02 17:37:45 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3221A63BB64938E5814E9EF61DE34E97B6600325C33BA6D489A64D483D628071
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Aparte del claro ataque personal (ad hominem) de la nota propuesta, la información que da no tiene sentido. El post original dice literalmente que "Constitucionaliza el modelo actual", donde existe un componente público. Dejen de abusar de las notas para poner opiniones.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1720111047690907834
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3221A63BB64938E5814E9EF61DE34E97B6600325C33BA6D489A64D483D628071
  • createdAtMillis - 1698946665703
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17201110476909078343221A63BB64938E5814E9EF61DE34E97B6600325C33BA6D489A64D483D628071